The Supreme Court bears responsibility for George Floyd’s death.
The murder of George Floyd one year ago by Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin once again exposed the gaping chasm between our Constitution’s promises and the reality of policing in America. While the criminal conviction of Derek Chauvin by a Minneapolis jury provides some accountability for Floyd’s murder, our current system has done little to stanch the flood of police violence that took Floyd’s life—and the lives of so many others—because the Supreme Court has repeatedly gutted one of our most important federal civil rights laws.
Congress must begin the work of repairing our system of constitutional accountability by undoing the court’s decimation of one key law. Known as Section 1983, the law allows individuals to go to court to redress violations of constitutional rights by state and local governments and their agents. The Supreme Court, though, over the years has eviscerated it by inventing doctrines found nowhere in the text or history of the law.
In order to enforce the 14thAmendment, Section 1983 provides that “[e]very person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State” subjects any person “to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured” in a court of law. Enacted in 1871 against the backdrop of horrific state and Ku Klux Klan violence aimed at undoing Reconstruction’s promises of racial justice, Section 1983 gave those victimized by official abuse of power a critically important tool to hold governments and their agents accountable in a court of law. The law aimed to stop state actors and others from killing, brutalizing, and terrorizing Black people with impunity.
AdvertisementTo this end, the text of Section 1983 does not recognize any immunities from accountability.
Advertisement Advertisement AdvertisementCongress made a conscious choice not to provide any official immunities because it sought to hold state officials accountable for violating constitutional rights, not to permit such officials to flout the law with impunity.
What is less well-known is that Congress explicitly rejected the idea that persons should be exempt from responsibility simply because they held a position of power. Congress modeled Section 1983’s design of constitutional accountability on the Civil Rights Act of 1866, which contained criminal penalties against state officials that violated the law’s prohibitions on racial discrimination. In debates over this precursor to Section 1983, the law’s supporters insisted that official immunities are akin to the idea that “the King can do no wrong” and wrongfully “places officials above the law.” Section 1983 incorporated an identical remedial framework. Section 1983, like the 1866 Act, did not provide any immunities because Congress refused to place officials “above the law.”
AdvertisementThe Supreme Court has repeatedly insisted that the court’s role in statutory interpretation is to enforce the plain meaning of the words chosen by Congress. But it has repeatedly ignored the text, context, and history of Section 1983, doing violence to the language chosen by Congress. By gutting Section 1983 through judicial fiat, the Supreme Court has let state and local governments and their agents violate our most cherished constitutional rights with impunity and left those victimized by abuse of power without any remedy.
AdvertisementIn its cases interpreting—or rather rewriting—Section 1983, the Supreme Court has made the words “clearly established” and “policy” paramount. Let’s start with “clearly established.” Under the judicially created doctrine of qualified immunity, a suit against a government officer must be dismissed unless the state or local officer violated clearly established constitutional rights. In practice, unless the plaintiff can point to a prior precedent with essentially identical facts, courts insist that the law is not clearly established. That means that much of the time, constitutional violations go unremedied and justice is denied to those victimized by abuse of power. Moreover, because a court can dismiss a case without ruling on whether the official violated the plaintiff’s constitutional rights, the contours of constitutional rights may remain frozen in place, preventing rights from ever becoming clearly established and bolting the courthouse doors firmly shut to those aggrieved by official abuse of power.
Advertisement AdvertisementThe word “policy” is equally important to the story of how the Supreme Court has gutted Section 1983. Employers in the private sector are liable for the legal wrongs committed by their employees and agents, but the Supreme Court has refused to apply this longstanding principle of accountability to municipalities. Instead, local governments, with few exceptions, cannot be held liable for constitutional violations committed by their officers and agents within the scope of their duties. As a result, one of the most powerful tools for systemic reform—holding the government itself liable—is off the table.
Advertisement AdvertisementIn the 1978 case of Monell v. Department of Social Services, the Supreme Court held in essence that a city can only be held liable if a municipal “policy” caused the constitutional deprivation. (A municipal custom will count as well, but the court has basically ignored that category entirely.) The “policy” requirement for local governmental liability, like qualified immunity’s “clearly established” law requirement, is a dead end for accountability. The last time the Supreme Court held that a municipal “policy” caused a constitutional violation was in 1986, more than three decades ago.
AdvertisementRead the text of Section 1983. You will not find “clearly established” or “policy” in the language enacted into law by Congress. The Supreme Court simply made these words up to allow the government and its agents to evade accountability. As Justice John Paul Stevens put it in denouncing the policy requirement for governmental liability, it is “judicial legislation of the most blatant kind.”
Popular in News & Politics
- A Great American Con Led to the Mess on College Campuses. Everyone Fell for It—Again.
- There’s One Part of Brittney Griner’s Account of Life in Russian Prison That Really Stands Out
- The Trump Defense Made Hope Hicks Cry. The Prosecution Got What It Wanted.
- Of Course Donald Trump’s Defense Is to Pin Everything on the Woman
By creating a nearly insurmountable barrier to suing the officer who violated someone’s constitutional rights andthe government that made the officer’s abuse of power possible, the Supreme Court’s judicially-created doctrines operate synergistically to allow constitutional rights to be violated with impunity. Together they form a system of government unaccountability. As a result, the cycle of racialized policing and racial violence that took George Floyd’s life continues unchecked. And policing is just one small slice of the abuses Section 1983 concerns. By gutting Section 1983 in a myriad of ways, the court has sanctioned deprivations of free speech, allowed prosecutors to destroy innocent lives, and let abuse of power in prison flourish. Rather than giving full effect to a law designed to enforce the 14thAmendment, the Supreme Court has gutted it to protect governments and their agents and legitimize violations of constitutional rights.
Congress can change this. One year after the killing of George Floyd, Congress has the opportunity and the responsibility to begin repairing our system of constitutional accountability and to ensure that our most cherished constitutional guarantees do not exist merely on paper. The only way to fix the long line of immunity doctrines devised by the court is to end them and ensure that those victimized by the government can seek justice in the courts.
Tweet Share Share Comment(责任编辑:产品中心)
- [Graphic News] Average book price nears 20,000 won
- “拼多多杯”第二届科技小院大赛重庆开赛,滇桂渝3地各有1支队伍晋级决赛
- 加强监督管理 保护水生生物
- Diplomatic hurdles face possible papal visit
- Coach jailed for sexual exploitation of underage athlete
- Ruling bloc divided on foreign nannies' pay
- How to reset your iPhone back to factory settings
- 汉源县志愿者宣传文明旅游
- Tested: Ryzen Mobile Gets Better Drivers, Finally
- Top 10 Most Significant Nvidia GPUs of All Time
- Ministry to inject W11.2tr into higher, lifelong education
- Dispute continues over removal of 'sexual minority' from curriculum
- New catalyst rearranges carbon dioxide and water into ethanol fuel
-
South Korean lawmakers brace for US election as Harris, Trump diverge on North Korea
Democratic presidential nominee and US Vice President Kamala Harris waves from the stage on Day 4 of ...[详细] -
Yoon calls for stronger deterrence, sanctions following N.Korean ICBM launch
President Yoon Suk-yeol (2nd from R) attends a National Security Council meeting at the presidential ...[详细] -
雅安日报/北纬网讯吸烟有害健康,这应是所有人的共识。但吸烟所影响的,不仅是吸烟者本人的身体健康,也会对周围的人,尤其是未成年人造成危害。今年,国家卫健委发布的世界无烟日的主题为:“保护青少年远离传统烟 ...[详细]
-
Back to School Tech Guide 2018
...[详细] -
Apple iPod: The First 10 Years of the Ubiquitous Media Player
#ThrowbackThursday: The iPod is one of the most iconic devices of the 21st century and the product t ...[详细] -
The Future of Tech: Gaming Consoles, the Xbox and PlayStation of Tomorrow
Consoles have come a very long way since the arrival of first-generation machines from Atari and Col ...[详细] -
DeFi platform begs hackers to return $600 million in stolen crypto
It doesn't hurt to ask. The decentralized finance platform (DeFi) Ploy Network pleaded with hackers ...[详细] -
Pompeo heads to North Korea for meeting with Kim Jong
United States Secretary of State Mike Pompeo arrived in Pyongyang on Sunday and is set to meet North ...[详细] -
[Herald Review] Tori Kelly thrills fans, hints her love for Korean artists
Tori Kelly performs during her first concert in Korea held at Seoul, Tuesday. (Live Nation Korea)Ame ...[详细] -
Australian woman allegedly received an accidental multimillion
Let’s say you were Thevamanogari Manivel, a woman in Melbourne, Australia with an interest in ...[详细]
- 13 Places to Find Little Legends and Compact Cryptids
- Google Easter egg pays tribute to the late Betty White
- How to connect Bluetooth headphones to a Windows PC
- 大院环境改善 居民齐声点赞
- [From the Scene] How ‘world’s first oil town’ is wrestling to become ‘green'
- 创造无烟环境 呵护未成年人健康成长
- S. Korean defense chief calls on China to play 'constructive' role over NK threats