The Trump administration’s attack on territorial voting rights.
Over the last eight months, the Trump administration has launched an assault on voting rights designed to limit access to the ballot. Attorney General Jeff Sessions’ Justice Department has defended voter ID laws and state efforts to purge voters from the rolls, and the president’s voter fraud commission has peddled falsehoods to lay the groundwork for a rollback of voting rights laws. This month, the administration has urged a court to strip voting rights from an entire class of people.
This latest gambit involves the rights of United States citizens who relocate from a state to a U.S. territory. Under the Uniformed and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act (UOCAVA), states must allow citizens to vote by absentee ballot in federal elections when they relocate anywhere outside the U.S. The law is meant to be global, even cosmic: Citizens retain their right to vote absentee for federal offices if they move to a foreign country, a research station in Antarctica, or the International Space Station. But bizarrely, the statute does not require states to let citizens vote absentee if they move to four U.S. territories: Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands, Guam, or American Samoa. It does compel states to let citizens vote absentee if they move to a fifth permanently inhabited territory, the Northern Mariana Islands.
In 2015, Illinois residents who relocated to several of these disfavored territories filed a lawsuit challenging this limitation as an equal protection violation. They argued that the UOCAVA arbitrarily limits their right to vote in federal elections. (U.S. territories do not receive full representation in Congress and may not vote for president.) By protecting the absentee voting rights of residents of the Northern Mariana Islands but not those who live in other U.S. territories, the plaintiffs argued, the UOCAVA irrationally discriminates against certain territorial residents in violation of the Fifth Amendment. The only solution is to extend absentee voting rights to residents of every U.S. territory.
AdvertisementThe Justice Department began defending the UOCAVA during the Obama administration, and won at the district court level. It’s perfectly acceptable for the DOJ to defend a bad federal law—that’s its job—and the agency maintained its position on appeal under Sessions. But in September, the DOJ unexpectedly took an aggressive new stance. In a letter filed with the 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, the DOJ argued that, if UOCAVA infringes upon equal protection, the proper remedy is to strip the absentee voting rightsof residents of the Northern Mariana Islands, not to extend them to all territorial residents.
Advertisement Advertisement AdvertisementThis extreme remedy, the Justice Department claimed, would be mandated by the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Sessions v. Morales-Santana. That is absurd. It is true that, in Morales-Santana, the court struck down a statute granting favorable treatment to mothers rather than expanding favorable treatment to fathers. But that is because the unconstitutional provision providing favorable treatment to mothers was an exception to the broader rule. Here, the disfavorable treatment of some territorial residents is the exception to the broader rule of global absentee voting rights. And in such situations, the Morales-Santana court explained, “extension, rather than nullification, is the proper course.”
AdvertisementI asked Neil Weare, president of the We the People Project—which brought this litigation—what he made of the DOJ’s letter. “As far as we can tell,” he told me, “no court has ever taken away voting rights to remedy an equal protection violation. It would be unprecedented.”
The Justice Department’s defense of UOCAVA may have some specious appeal. In effect, the DOJ asserts that the law was designed to preserve Americans’ voting rights when they move out of the country. But since territories like Guam and American Samoa are part of the United States, this argument goes, residents should have to register there instead of voting absentee in their previous states.
AdvertisementThat argument cannot withstand scrutiny under Morales-Santana for several reasons. UOCAVA pertains exclusively to federal elections: A citizen living in Puerto Rico—which has no electoral votes and no voting representatives in Congress—has as much federal representation as a citizen living in Portugal unless she can vote by absentee ballot. The law was designed to protect citizens’ right to federal representation when they would otherwise lose it. But that goal is undermined by the statute’s territorial carve-out, which means this carve-out must therefore be seen as an exception to UOCAVA’s general rule. In Morales-Santana, the Supreme Court said disfavorable exceptions can be rectified by extending equal treatment. Here, that would mean allowing all territorial residents to vote absentee, not taking away morecitizens’ federal representation.
Weare told me that the NMI government encourages relocated mainlanders to vote absentee. It would be yet another blow to Americans’ voting rights if a court were to deny them the federal representation they currently enjoy. This issue might seem minor—but it demonstrates the Trump administration’s zeal to marshal any arguments it can to disenfranchise Americans. In Sessions’ Justice Department, less voting is always preferable to more. And this small conflict provides a disturbing preview of the much bigger voting rights battles ahead.
Tweet Share Share Comment(责任编辑:资讯)
- When will Trump and Harris debate? The presidential campaigns snipe over ABC News’ rules.
- Pastor released from North Korea publishes book
- North Korean vice sports minister cancels plan to visit Japan: report
- Apple Event: New iPad Air revealed with M1 chip
- Doosan scraps controversial Robotics
- Tesla issues recall for 9,100 Model X cars
- N. Korea says 'no interest in denuke talks' as long as South
- Apple Event: New iPad Air revealed with M1 chip
- 启动被征地农民 养老保障经办工作
- NASA rover snaps photo of its most daunting challenge yet
- Joe Biden, Donald Trump, and the presidential debate: Biden’s best zingers.
- Trump's feral Fox Business Network interview with Maria Bartiromo shows he's come undone.
- Weather agency says 3.5 magnitude quake occurs in Pyonggang, North Korea
-
In 2007, Flickr was the most popular dedicated photo-sharing site on the web, and growing exponentia ...[详细]
-
Obamacare Supreme Court case: If conservatives take a 6–3 majority, the law may still survive.
Following the death of Ruth Bader Ginsburg, the fate of Obamacare is newly in doubt.Until last week, ...[详细] -
Apple Event: New iPad Air revealed with M1 chip
Apple revealed its latest iPad Air model during its "Peek Performance" event, featuring Apple's impr ...[详细] -
Will this debate change anyone’s mind?
Jordan Weissmann:Jim, we just watched a debate where two septugenarian candidates for the American p ...[详细] -
Tesla considers adding a new ‘stuck detection' feature to Cybertruck. Here’s why.
By now, you've probably seen the viral videos of the Tesla Cybertruck get stuck trying to do, well, ...[详细] -
Bye literally everyone: 11 best tweets from Twitter's worst week
It's been a weird week for Twitter. Elon Musk, now officially at the helm of the social platform, ca ...[详细] -
“医生,我这个肺小结节是不是早期肺癌”“我的磨玻璃结节怎么办,一想到就睡不着”……拿到体检报告后,不少人会陷入“结节焦虑”。“临床上,不少患者的肺癌是由磨玻璃结节发展而来,因此很多人看到‘磨玻璃结节’ ...[详细]
-
Apple Event: Apple's new Mac Studio costs $8,000 maxed out — monitor not included
Another Apple Event has come and gone, which means it's time for my favorite post-show activity: Che ...[详细] -
11 Telescopes Exploring The Magic of Space
Perhaps no invention has broadened our understanding of the universe more than the telescope. The ve ...[详细] -
Trump positive: What happens if COVID forces Biden or Trump out of the race?
President Donald Trump and first lady Melania Trump have the coronavirus, and the White House report ...[详细]
Sinner vs. Michelsen 2024 livestream: Watch US Open for free
Moon hopes for North Korean leader's participation in ASEAN summit
- iPhone 16 Pro new color will reportedly be Desert Titanium
- DHS talking points reportedly emphasized Kenosha shooter Kyle Rittenhouse’s side of the story.
- Trump positive: What happens if COVID forces Biden or Trump out of the race?
- 环保教育进校园 绿色低碳我先行
- Upgrade Your Monitor, Not Your GPU
- DHS talking points reportedly emphasized Kenosha shooter Kyle Rittenhouse’s side of the story.
- Best deals of the day Oct. 25: A Lenovo laptop for under $100, the Bissell Crosswave, and more